Supply Chain Disruption Risk in Excel | Vose Software

ModelRisk example · Manufacturing

Supply-Chain Disruption

What do supplier disruptions cost us, and which protection pays? Safety stock, a second source or insurance.

  • Complexity: ★★★★★
  • Free Excel workbook (MF-06)
  • Needs ModelRisk: free trial

From the model’s saved run

What do disruptions cost?

Doing nothing: days the plant stands still, and the contribution lost (US$m).

MeasureUnit5th pctMedian95th pctMean
Days lostdays–2.058.713.0
Contribution lostUS$m–0.4914.673.25
MeasureUnitValue
Chance of losing any days in a year54.6%
Chance of losing more than 30 days14.2%
1 year in 100 (99th percentile)US$m28.48
Days lost in a year, doing nothing — distribution

The business question

An appliance maker buys castings and electronics from two suppliers in the same coastal region, motors from a supplier abroad and packaging locally — one source each. Every so often a supplier stops: a fire at the foundry, a chip allocation, a strike, a missed delivery.

Ten days of safety stock absorb most of these, but a long disruption stops the plant, losing about US$250,000 of contribution a day. And a typhoon or an earthquake in the coastal region would stop castings and electronics together. The board is weighing three protections: thirty days of stock for the critical parts, a second electronics supplier elsewhere, or business-interruption insurance.

Who it is for
Supply-chain and procurement managers, risk managers, plant and finance directors.
Main outputs
The plant's lost days and lost contribution in a year, average and bad years · each supplier's share · the annual cost of each protection option, including its own cost, average, 1 in 20 and 1 in 100 years.

How the model works

Three sheets after this one, read from left to right. Each one feeds the next.

  1. Inputs sheet

    The contribution lost per day stopped and today's safety stock. For each supplier and for the regional disaster, how often a disruption happens and how long it lasts; the cost and effect of each option.

  2. Disruptions sheet

    Each iteration draws the number of disruptions of each source (Poisson) and the length of each (Lognormal). Safety stock covers the first days; the rest stops the plant. The same disruptions are then replayed with more stock, with a second electronics supplier and with insurance.

  3. Results sheet

    Days lost and contribution lost in a year; each source's share; each option's total annual cost — its own cost plus the losses it leaves — on average, 1 year in 20 and 1 year in 100.

ModelRisk techniques

  • Poisson disruptions, Lognormal durations
  • Common-cause regional event
  • Safety stock
  • Common random numbers
  • Return-period curves

Find similar models

Product

The results in detail

Which source stops the plant?

Average days lost a year to each source, doing nothing.

SourceRate a yearLength days, meanDays lost a yearShare of days lost
Castings (East)0.30203.2325%
Electronics (East)0.25305.1740%
Motors (West)0.40152.5720%
Packaging (local)0.5050.222%
Regional disaster, East0.05451.8214%

Which protection pays?

Each option's annual cost: what it costs, plus the losses it leaves (US$m).

Annual cost by option — return periods
OptionAverage1 in 20 95th pct1 in 100 99th pct1 in 200 99.5th pctLowest average
Do nothing3.2514.6728.4834.69
More safety stock1.958.3021.8128.40✔ lowest
Second electronics supplier2.5610.3319.7923.98
Business-interruption insurance3.667.1415.4821.69

How to read these results

  • Doing nothing, disruptions stop the plant in about half of all years, for 13 days on average. One year in 20 it loses about 59 days — US$15 million of contribution — and one year in 100 about US$28 million.
  • Electronics cause 40% of the days lost: disruptions there are no more frequent than at the foundry, but longer and more variable. The regional disaster is rare — one year in twenty — but stops two suppliers at once for weeks: 14% of the days lost.
  • Thirty days of stock is the cheapest protection on average — about US$1.95 million a year with its holding cost, against US$3.25 million for doing nothing — and nearly halves the 1-in-20 loss. A second electronics supplier saves less on average but cuts the very worst years a little more.

    As shipped it takes over in 7 days, before the 10 days of stock run out, so it ends every electronics stop on its own: what it leaves is the other suppliers and the regional disaster.

  • Insurance costs more on average than doing nothing — its premium is above its expected payout — but it protects best against bad years: about US$7 million 1 year in 20 and US$15 million 1 year in 100. The options answer different questions: what is cheapest on average, and what the company can survive.
  • Combinations are worth testing: more stock for castings and motors, a second source for electronics, insurance for the regional disaster.

See it move. Open the workbook, change an input on the Inputs sheet and run the simulation: every table and chart on this page updates in Excel.

Inputs and assumptions

Every assumption in the model, with its uncertainty and where it comes from. The figures are illustrative.

The plant 2 inputs
AssumptionUnitValue
Contribution lost per day stoppedAbout US$62m a year over 250 days.US$m0.25
Safety stock todayOf every purchased part.days10
Suppliers 15 inputs

How often each source is disrupted, and for how long.

AssumptionUnitValue
Castings (East): disruptionsSingle foundry; fire or breakdown.a year0.30
Castings (East): average lengthdays20
Castings (East): standard deviation of lengthdays15
Electronics (East): disruptionsChip allocation; long and uncertain.a year0.25
Electronics (East): average lengthdays30
Electronics (East): standard deviation of lengthdays30
Motors (West): disruptionsQuality holds and strikes.a year0.40
Motors (West): average lengthdays15
Motors (West): standard deviation of lengthdays10
Packaging (local): disruptionsShort hiccups.a year0.50
Packaging (local): average lengthdays5
Packaging (local): standard deviation of lengthdays4
Regional disaster, East: disruptionsA typhoon or earthquake stops castings and electronics together.a year0.05
Regional disaster, East: average lengthdays45
Regional disaster, East: standard deviation of lengthdays30
Options 7 inputs
AssumptionUnitValue
1 More stock: safety stock of castings, electronics, motorsdays30
1 More stock: cost of holding it20 days × US$150,000 of parts a day × 25% a year.US$m a year0.75
2 Second source: days to take over the electronicsA qualified supplier in another region.days7
2 Second source: price premium3% on US$20m of electronics.US$m a year0.60
3 Insurance: waiting periodDays stopped before cover starts, per event.days10
3 Insurance: limitUS$m a year15.0
3 Insurance: premiumThe insurer's expected payout plus its margin.US$m a year2.00

Units and conventions

Money
US$ million (US$m) a year.
Days lost
Days the plant stands still: a disruption's length beyond the safety stock.
Annual cost
Contribution lost plus the option's own cost, less any insurance recovery.
1 in 20, 1 in 100, 1 in 200
The 95th, 99th and 99.5th percentiles of the annual cost.

Key assumptions and limitations

Disruptions
Independent between suppliers, apart from the regional disaster; at most five per source a year.
Overlap
Days lost to different disruptions are added: overlaps are rare.
Recovery
Production restarts as soon as parts arrive; lost sales are not recovered later.
Data
The plant, the suppliers and all figures are invented for this example.

How to use it

  1. Enter your daily contribution and safety stock.
  2. Enter how often each supplier is disrupted and for how long — and any common causes.
  3. Run a simulation from the ModelRisk ribbon (10,000 samples with a fixed seed are set).
  4. Compare the options on average cost and on bad years; they answer different questions.

ModelRisk functions used

VosePoisson
The number of disruptions of a source in a year.
VoseLognormal
The length of a disruption, by its mean and standard deviation.
VoseSimMean, VoseSimPercentile, VoseSimProbability
Statistics of the simulation on the Results sheet.

Further reading

  • Monte Carlo simulation explained (Vose guide)
  • Sheffi, Y. (2005). The Resilient Enterprise. MIT Press.
  • Vose, D. (2008). Risk Analysis: A Quantitative Guide, 3rd edition. Wiley — risk events.